ارزیابی شواهد بالینی - اپیدمیولوژیک بیماران مبتلا به شکستگی اطراف پروتز پس از آرتروپلاستی کامل زانو

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه جراحی ارتوپدی، دانشکده‌ی پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

2 کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

10.22034/ijos.2025.243330
چکیده
چکیده
مقدمه: شکستگی‌های پروتز اطراف مفصل پس از آرتروپلاستی کامل زانو (TKA) از عوارض پیچیده این جراحی محسوب می‌شوند، به‌ویژه در بیماران سالمند و مبتلا به پوکی استخوان. شناسایی عوامل خطر بالینی و اپیدمیولوژیک برای بهبود راهبردهای پیشگیری و مدیریت ضروری است.
مواد و روش‌ها: در این مطالعه مقطعی و گذشته‌نگر، بیماران مبتلا به شکستگی پَروتز اطراف زانو-۴۵ بیمار و ۹۰ بیمار بدون شکستگی (گروه کنترل) که طی دو سال در دو مرکز آموزشی درمان شده بودند، مطالعه شدند. اطلاعات جمعیت‌شناختی و بالینی، شاخص توده بدنی (BMI)، پوکی استخوان، مصرف کورتیکواستروئید و سابقه‌ی آرتروپلاستی مجدد زانو ثبت شد. شکستگی‌ها براساس محل آناتومیک و پایداری ایمپلنت با استفاده از سیستم‌های استاندارد طبقه‌بندی شدند. برای تعیین عوامل خطر مستقل از رگرسیون لجستیک استفاده شد.
نتایج و بحث: از میان ۴۵ بیمار مبتلا به شکستگی، 9/68 درصد زن و 7/66 درصد بالای ۶۰ سال بودند. شایع‌ترین محل شکستگی، فمور (6/75 درصد) بود. اکثر شکستگی‌ها (6/75 درصد) بیش از ۹۰ روز پس از جراحی رخ دادند. اضافه‌وزن و چاقی عوامل خطر مستقل محسوب شدند و بیشترین خطر مربوط به آرتروپلاستی مجدد زانو بود. پوکی استخوان و مصرف کورتیکواستروئید گرچه معنادار نبودند، اما روندی افزایشی در خطر نشان دادند. سن و جنس ارتباط معناداری با خطر شکستگی نداشتند.
نتیجه‌گیری: چاقی و سابقه آرتروپلاستی مجدد زانو از مهم‌ترین عوامل خطر مستقل برای شکستگی اطراف پَروتز زانو پس از TKA هستند. پوکی استخوان و مصرف کورتیکواستروئید نیز می‌توانند در افزایش ریسک نقش داشته باشند. استفاده از شاخص توده بدنی، وضعیت بازبینی جراحی، سلامت استخوان و تاریخچه دارویی در ارزیابی پیش‌عمل و پیگیری پس از عمل می‌تواند به کاهش بروز این عارضه کمک کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Risk factors for Periprosthetic Fracture After Total Knee Arthroplasty

نویسندگان English

Mahdi Motififard 1
Mahdi Hdian 1
Alireza Assadi 2
Seyed Mohammadreza Zamanian 2
1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 MD, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده English

Abstract
Introduction: Intra-articular pilon fractures of the distal tibia are complicated fractures with far-reaching long-term functional consequences. Despite improved surgical methods, the ideal management protocols and resulting recuperation patterns continue to be topics of recent investigation. This study aims to compare functional outcome, and rates of complications after surgical management of pilon fractures by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and also to compare the effect of age on recovery and modes of complications.
Materials & Methods: This is a prospective observational cohort study of 183 type B or C pilon fracture patients treated at a single trauma center. The level of functional recovery 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-injury was measured by the Foot Function Index (FFI). Postoperative complications were noted, and the time to return to normal activities. Repeated-measures ANOVA was employed in the assessment of temporal changes in FFI scores.
Results & Discussion: There was significant improvement on all subscales of FFI during 12 months of time (P<0.001), with most improvement in the first 6 months. The mean duration of time to return to activity was 25.5±7.5 weeks. Complications were malunion (23.0%), nonunion (30.6%), deep infection (15.8%), loosening of implant (14.8%), and reoperation (36.6%). Age was correlated with increased complications. Compared with ORIF, MIPO achieved comparable 12-month functional recovery (FFI improvement) while demonstrating a lower, though not statistically significant, rate of deep infection, suggesting similar efficacy with a potential advantage in soft-tissue preservation.
Conclusion: Operative management of pilon fracture yields significant functional improvement, although complications are common. Prognosis depends on age. Preoperative planning should be meticulous, close observation necessary, and individualized rehabilitation in order to maximize outcome.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Tibial fractures
Treatment outcomes
Fracture healing
1.        Agarwal AR, Cohen JS, Tarawneh OH, Gu A, Debritz J, Golladay GJ, Thakkar SC. The impact of prior fragility fractures on long-term periprosthetic fracture risk following total knee arthroplasty. Osteoporos Int. 2023 Aug; 34(8): 1429-1436. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06746-2. Epub 2023 May 11. PMID: 37166492.
2.        Bauer C, Zaharia B, Galliot F, Parot J, Houfani F, Mayer J, Mainard D. Management and results in periprosthetic tibial fracture after total knee arthroplasty: Two-center 15-case retrospective series at 2 years' follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 May; 106(3): 449-458. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.01.008. Epub 2020 Mar 14. PMID: 32184065.
3.        Chantelot C, Saab M, Bégué T, Kaba A, Favreau H, Ehlinger M. Periprosthetic fracture around total knee arthroplasty: What are the advantages of minimal-invasive surgery? Injury. 2024 Jun; 55 Suppl 1: 111351. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111351. Epub 2024 Jul 26. PMID: 39069343.
4.        Chantelot C, Saab M, Martin T, Begue T, Ehlinger M, Flecher X; SoFCOT. Revision total knee arthroplasty with periprosthetic distal femoral fracture. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2024 Nov; 110(7): 103856. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103856. Epub 2024 Mar 2. PMID: 38438108.
5.        Chowdary AR, Wukich DK, Sambandam S. Complications of periprosthetic fracture revision vs aseptic revision of total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop. 2024 Feb 23; 53: 20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.02.033. PMID: 38450064; PMCID: PMC10912218.
6.        Lenz M, Acklin YP, Kasper LA, Mischler D, Varga P, Zderic I, Gehweiler D, Klos K, Gueorguiev B, Stoffel K. Biomechanical evaluation of the docking nail concept in periprosthetic fracture fixation around a stemmed total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Biomechanics. 2021; 115: 110109. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110109
7.        Lombardo DJ, Siljander MP, Sobh A, Moore DD, Karadsheh MS. Periprosthetic fractures about total knee arthroplasty. Musculoskelet Surg. 2020 Aug; 104(2): 135-143. doi: 10.1007/s12306-019-00628-9. Epub 2019 Oct 23. PMID: 31643045.
8.        Mayr MF, Südkamp NP, Konstantinidis L. Periprosthetic fracture management around total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop. 2021 Jan 5; 23: 239-245. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.12.024. PMID: 33613007; PMCID: PMC7876523.
9.        Redondo-Trasobares B, Torres-Campos A, Calvo-Tapies JR, Gran-Ubeira N, Blanco-Rubio N, Albareda-Albareda J. Risk factors of periprosthetic femoral fracture after total knee arthroplasty. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed). 2020 Jul-Aug; 64(4): 258-264. English, Spanish. doi: 10.1016/j.recot.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 May 4. PMID: 32381394.
10.     Forlenza EM, Serino J 3rd, Acuña AJ, Terhune EB, Behery OA, Della Valle CJ. Bisphosphonate Use in Patients Who Have Osteoporosis Does Not Increase the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture Following Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2025 Jun; 40(6): 1390-1396. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.004. Epub 2024 Nov 9. PMID: 39528168.
11.     Burke JF, Quinlan ND, Werner BC, Barnes CL, Browne JA. Osteopetrosis is Associated With an Increased Risk for Intraoperative Periprosthetic Fracture in Total Hip Arthroplasty but not in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jan; 38(1): 24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.08.016. Epub 2022 Aug 13. PMID: 35973574..
12.     Park YB, Kim M, Nam HC, Jeon JW, Ha CW. Total knee arthroplasty and periprosthetic distal femoral fracture: looking beyond the osteoporosis to previous osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2024 Aug; 35(8): 1469-1475. doi: 10.1007/s00198-024-07138-w. Epub 2024 May 27. PMID: 38801524.
13.     Meyer JA, Zhu M, Cavadino A, Coleman B, Munro JT, Young SW. Infection and periprosthetic fracture are the leading causes of failure after aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Aug; 141(8): 1373-1383. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03698-8. Epub 2021 Jan 30. PMID: 33515323.
14.     Harris AB, Lantieri MA, Agarwal AR, Golladay GJ, Thakkar SC. Osteoporosis and Total Knee Arthroplasty: Higher 5-Year Implant-Related Complications. J Arthroplasty. 2024 Apr; 39(4): 948-953.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.10.045. Epub 2023 Oct 30. PMID: 37914037.
15.     Rodriguez-Merchan EC. Re-revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Causes, Risk Factors and Results. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024; 12(5): 328-332. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2024.75456.3490. PMID: 38817414; PMCID: PMC11134262.
16.     Stamiris D, Gkekas NK, Asteriadis K, Stamiris S, Anagnostis P, Poultsides L, Sarris I, Potoupnis M, Kenanidis E, Tsiridis E. Anterior femoral notching ≥ 3 mm is associated with increased risk for supracondylar periprosthetic femoral fracture after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022 Apr; 32(3): 383-393. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-02989-z. Epub 2021 Apr 26. PMID: 33900452.
17.     Mohammad HR, Judge A, Murray DW. A Comparison of the Periprosthetic Fracture Rate of Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasties: An Analysis of Data From the National Joint Registry. J Arthroplasty. 2024 Jun; 39(6): 1505-1511. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.11.039. Epub 2023 Dec 4. PMID: 38056722.
18.     Verma N, Jain A, Pal C, Thomas S, Agarwal S, Garg P. Management of periprosthetic fracture following total knee arthroplasty- a retrospective study to decide when to fix or when to revise? J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Mar; 11(Suppl 2): S246-S254. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Oct 15. PMID: 32189949; PMCID: PMC7068021.
19.     Wan Q, Zhang A, Liu Y, Chen H, Zhao X, Han Q, Wang J. Stem to prevent periprosthetic fracture after notching in total knee arthroplasty. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2024 Oct; 40(10): e3842. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3842. Epub 2024 Aug 5. PMID: 39099381.
20.     Puga TB, Lam A, Ferguson C, Box MW, Badylak J, Riehl JT. Body Mass Index (BMI) and Associations of Periprosthetic Fracture Risk after TKA: A Systematic Review. Journal of Orthopaedic Reports. 2025; 4(1s): 100545. doi: 10.1016/j.jorep.2024.100545
21.     Viswanathan VK, Subramanian S, Mounasamy V, Sambandam S. What are the predisposing factors for periprosthetic fractures following total hip arthroplasty? - a National Inpatient Sample-based study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Jun; 144(6): 2803-2810. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05343-0. Epub 2024 Apr 25. PMID: 38661998.
22.     Meek RM, Norwood T, Smith R, Brenkel IJ, Howie CR. The risk of peri-prosthetic fracture after primary and revision total hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Jan; 93(1): 96-101. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B1.25087. PMID: 21196551.
23.     Morwood MP, Gebhart SS, Zamith N, Mir HR. Outcomes of fixation for periprosthetic tibia fractures around and below total knee arthroplasty. Injury. 2019 Apr; 50(4): 978-982. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.03.014. Epub 2019 Mar 15. PMID: 30929804.
24.     Udagawa K, Niki Y, Harato K, Kobayashi S, Nomoto S. Arthroscopically Assisted Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing for Periprosthetic Fracture of the Femur after Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty. Case Rep Orthop. 2018 Apr 3; 2018: 1805145. doi: 10.1155/2018/1805145. PMID: 29850328; PMCID: PMC5903306.
25.     Kim KI, Egol KA, Hozack WJ, Parvizi J. Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 May; 446: 167-75. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000214417.29335.19. PMID: 16568003.
26.     Malik M, Halwai MA. Open reduction and internal fixation of patellar fractures with tension band wiring through cannulated screws. J Knee Surg. 2014 Oct; 27(5): 377-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1364100. Epub 2014 Jan 10. PMID: 24414389.
27.     Eastell R, Rosen CJ, Black DM, Cheung AM, Murad MH, Shoback D. Pharmacological Management of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women: An Endocrine Society* Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 May 1; 104(5): 1595-1622. doi: 10.1210/jc.2019-00221. PMID: 30907953.
28.     Buckley L, Guyatt G, Fink HA, Cannon M, Grossman J, Hansen KE, Humphrey MB, Lane NE, Magrey M, Miller M, Morrison L, Rao M, Robinson AB, Saha S, Wolver S, Bannuru RR, Vaysbrot E, Osani M, Turgunbaev M, Miller AS, McAlindon T. 2017 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Prevention and Treatment of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Aug; 69(8): 1521-1537. doi: 10.1002/art.40137. Epub 2017 Jun 6. Erratum in: Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Nov; 69(11): 2246. doi: 10.1002/art.40340. PMID: 28585373.
29.     Vasso M, Beaufils P, Schiavone Panni A. Constraint choice in revision knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2013 Jul; 37(7): 1279-84. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1929-y. Epub 2013 May 23. PMID: 23700251; PMCID: PMC3685670.
30.     King SW, Lamb JN, Cage ES, Pandit H. Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Maturitas. 2018 Nov; 117: 1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 27. PMID: 30314554.
31.     Singh JA, Lewallen DG. Association of peptic ulcer disease and pulmonary disease with risk of periprosthetic fracture after primary total knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Oct; 63(10): 1471-6. doi: 10.1002/acr.20548. PMID: 21748860; PMCID: PMC3183369.
.