Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Esfarayen University of Technology, Esfarayen, North Khorasan, Iran

2 Biomaterials Group, Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials Department, Materials and Energy Research Center, Tehran, Iran

3 Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

Background: To study the creep behavior for a series of biodegradable nanocomposites, which are used as implantable devices in the body such as bioscrews, is a crucial factor. In the current paper, we are investigating these biomaterials -short-time creep and creep recover manners- in several classic models.
Methods: The creep and creep recovery behaviors of nanocomposites composed of biodegradable polymer blends, poly (D/L) lactic acid (PDLLA) and polycaprolactone (PCL) reinforced with three different contents of 1, 3 and 6 percent weight percentage (Full name?)% bioactive glass nanoparticles (m-BGn) were modeled. Several theoretical models including Findley power law, Burgers and Weibull models were used to establish the relations between m-BGn dispersion and final creep and creep-recovery behaviors of nanocomposites.
Results: The Findley power law model confirmed that the lowest ‘A’ and highest ‘n’ parameters ( A is the amplitude of the transient creep strain and n is the time exponent) belong to the sample with the highest young modulus and the nanocomposites compared to PDLLA/PCL  blends have the lower ‘A’ and higher ‘n’ which can be related to retardation effect of m-BGn on creep strains. Besides, the burgers model results illustrated that all viscoelastic and viscoplastic parameters for nanocomposites possess higher values than those of the neat PDLLA/PCL blend. It means that the addition of glass nanoparticles leads to decrease creep strain , increasing the Burgers model prediction values which have inverse trend with . Moreover, the weibull distribution model results acknowledge that the introduction of m-BGn into PDLLA/PCL polymeric blends cause decrease  in the viscoelastic strain recovery values. This is due to hindering effects of m-BGn on creep recovery behavior of nanocomposites.
Conclusion: The results obtained from modeling of creep-recovery manners of PDLLA/PCL blend and its nanocomposites approved that the bioactive glass reinforcement nanoparticles play  impeding role on creep and creep recovery behaviors.     
           Level of evidence: I
 
 

Keywords

  1. Chopek J, Kmita G, Rosó P. Lifetime Prediction of Polymer Composite Implants Based on Creep and Fatigue Tests, Annals of trasnplantation, 2004; 9: 26-29.
  2. P, MartucciJ F, IannaceS., Vázquez A. Influence of the Fiber Content and the Processing Conditions on the Flexural Creep Behavior of Sisal–PCL–Starch Composites, Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 2002; 15(3): 253-265.
  3. Kim JS, Muliana AH. A combined viscoelastic–viscoplastic behavior of particle reinforced composites, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2010; 47: 580–594.
  4. Daver F, Kajtaz M, Brandt M, Shanks RA. Creep and Recovery Behavior of polyolefin-Rubber Nanocomposites Developed for Additive Manufacturing, Polymers (Basel), 2016; 8(12): 437.
  5. Hanemann T, Dorothée Vinga Szabó. Polymer-Nanoparticle Composites: From Synthesis to Modern Applications, Materials, 2010; 3: 3468-3517.
  6. Pegoretti A, Kolarik J, Peroni C, Migliaresi C. Recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate)/layered silicate nanocomposites: morphology and tensile mechanical properties, Polymer, 2004; 45: 2751-58.
  7. Perez CJ, Alvarez VA, Azquez AV. Creep behavior of layered silicate/starch– polycaprolactone blends nanocomposites, Materials Science and Engineering A, 2008; 480: 259–265.
  8. Esmaeilzadeh J, Hesaraki S, HadaviS M, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Esfandeh M. Microstructure and mechanical properties of biodegradable poly (D/L) lactic acid/ polycaprolactone blends processed from the solvent-evaporation technique, Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2017; 71: 807-819.
  9. Esmaeilzadeh J, Hesaraki S, Hadavi SM, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Esfandeh M. Poly (d/l) lactide / polycaprolactone/bioactive glass nanocomposites materials for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction screws: The effect of glass surface functionalization on mechanical properties and cell behaviors. Materials science and Engineering C,2017; 77: 978-989.
  10. Esmaeilzadeh J, Hesaraki S, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Asghari GhH, Kachoei AR. Creep behavior of biodegradable triple-component nanocomposites based on PLA/PCL/bioactive glass for ACL interference screws, The archive of bone & joint surgery, 2019, 7 (6) 531-537.
  11. Yao Z, Wu D, Chen C, Zhang M. Creep behavior of polyurethane nanocomposites with carbon nanotubes, Composites: Part A, 2013; 50: 65–72.

 

 

  1. Perez CJ, Alvarez VA, Azquez AV. Creep behavior of layered silicate/starch– polycaprolactone blends nanocomposites, Materials Science and Engineering A, 2008; 480: 259–265.
  2. Georgiopoulos, E. Kontou. The effect of wood-fiber type on the thermo-mechanical performance of a biodegradable polymer matrix, Journal of applied polymer science, 2015; 132(27), 42185.
  3. Martins C, Pinto V, Guedes RM, Marques AT. Creep and Stress Relaxation Behaviour of PLA-PCL Fibres – A Linear Modelling Approach, Procedia Engineering, 2015; 114: 768-775.
  4. Findley WN, La JS, Onaran K: Creep and Relaxation of Nonlinear Viscoelastic Materials with an Introduction to Linear Viscoelasticity, Dover Publications Inc, NewYork, 1998.
  5. Ward IM: Mechanical Properties of Solid Polymers, John Wiley and Sons Ltd,Weinheim, 1983.
  6. Fancey KS. A mechanical model for creep, recovery and stress relaxiation in polymeric materials, J. Mater. Sci. 2005; 40: 4827–4831.