The Effect of Pelvic Position on Pelvic Incidence

Ahmadi, Saeed; Falsafi, Mani; Ghaemian, Naser; Shirafkan, Hoda; Afshar, Amir Mahmoud

doi:10.22034/ijos.2025.547942.1166

The Effect of Pelvic Position on Pelvic Incidence

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Saeed Ahmadi ¹ ^¶

Mani Falsafi ²

Naser Ghaemian ¹

Hoda Shirafkan ³

Amir Mahmoud Afshar ¹

¹ Clinical Research Development Center, Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.

² Department of orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

³ Social determinants of health research center, health research institute, Babol university of medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22034/ijos.2025.547942.1166

Abstract

Abstract
Introduction: Given the importance of the stability of the pelvic incidence (PI) angle in evaluating spinal alignment and its significance in spinal fixation during surgical procedures, this study aims to investigate the PI angle and compare it in two positions: Full Flexion and Full Extension.
Materials & Methods: This cross-sectional study assessed 44 student volunteers using dynamic radiographic evaluation in two positions: Full Flexion and Full Extension. Dynamic radiographs were taken in two conditions: (1) seated with maximum forward bending (Full Flexion) and (2) lying supine with legs hanging off the edge of the bed to their maximum extent (Full Extension). The PI angle was measured using the PACS software.
Results & Discussion: The mean PI angles in the Full Flexion and Full Extension positions were not equal, demonstrating positional changes. The mean PI angle in Full Flexion was higher than in Full Extension. The mean difference in PI angle between the two positions was 3.6±3.9 degrees. In females, the mean PI angle in Full Flexion was 55.83±11.23 degrees, which was higher than in males (53.22±7.62 degrees), though this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.390). In Full Extension, the mean PI angle in females was 51.61±9.87 degrees, which was again higher than in males (49.65±7.05 degrees), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.608).
Conclusion: The study results indicate that pelvic positioning affects pelvic incidence, and PI measurements are not constant across different positions. Furthermore, PI in the Full Flexion position was greater than in the Full Extension position.

Keywords

Pelvis

Spine

Patient positioning

Subjects

Orthopedi

1 Mac-Thiong JM, Labelle H, Roussouly P. Pediatric sagittal alignment. European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society. 2011;20 (Suppl 5):586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1925-0

2 Grotle M, Småstuen MC, Fjeld O, Grøvle L, Helgeland J, Storheim K, et al. Lumbar spine surgery across 15 years: trends, complications and reoperations in a longitudinal observational study from Norway. BMJ open. 2019;9(8):e028743. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028743

3 Schwab F, Dubey A, Gamez L, El Fegoun AB, Hwang K, Pagala M, et al. Adult scoliosis: prevalence, SF-36, and nutritional parameters in an elderly volunteer population. Spine. 2005;30(9):1082-1085. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000160842.43482.cd

4 Jacob CJ, Cardoso IM, Batista JL, Maia TC, Roncaglio B. Spinopelvic parameters evaluation in a Brazilian population sample. European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology: orthopedie traumatologie. 2015;25 (Suppl 1): 21-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1647-9

5 Yukawa Y, Kato F, Suda K, Yamagata M, Ueta T, Yoshida M. Normative data for parameters of sagittal spinal alignment in healthy subjects: an analysis of gender specific differences and changes with aging in 626 asymptomatic individuals. Eur Spine J. 2018;27:426–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4807-7

6 Chung NS, Jeon CH, Lee HD, Won SH. Measurement of Spinopelvic Parameters on Standing Lateral Lumbar Radiographs: Validity and Reliability. Clinical spine surgery. 2017;30(2): 119-123. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000448

7 Henneman S, Antoneli P, de Oliveira G. Pelvic incidence: A fundamental parameter for defining the sagittal balance of the spine. Coluna/Columna. 2012;11(3):237-239. DOI: 10.1590/S1808-18512012000300011

8 Li WS, Li G, Chen ZQ, Wood KB. Sagittal plane analysis of the spine and pelvis in adult idiopathic scoliosis. Chinese medical journal. 2010;123(21):2978-2982. DOI: 10.3760

9 Golbakhsh MR, Siavashi B, Attar M, Ramim T. Correlation between Lumbar vertebral instability and severe degenerative spondylolisthesis Tehran University Medical Journal. 2013;71(1):46-52. ISSN:1683-1764

10 Ameri E, Ghandhari H, Vahid Tari H, Noori A, Hesarikia H, Nabizadeh N. Change in Sagittal Spine and Spinopelvic Parameters in Children during Growth. Iranian Journal of Surgery. 2013;21(3):44-52.

11 Kim D, Davis DD, Menger RP. Spine sagittal balance. 2023. PMID: 30521279

12 Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Hecquet J, Marty C. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. E Spine J. 1998;7(2):99-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860050038.

13 Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O, Roussouly P. Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases. Eur Spine J.2007;16(9):1459-1467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0294-6.

14 Le Huec JC, Aunoble S, Philippe L, Nicolas P. Pelvic parameters: origin and significance. Eur Spine J. 2011;20 (Suppl 5):564-571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1940-1

15 Le Huec J, Thompson W, Mohsinaly Y, Barrey C, Faundez A. Sagittal balance of the spine. European spine journal. 2019;28(9):1889-1905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06083-1

16 Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Benaim C, Mitulescu A, Marty C, et al. Anatomical reliability of two fundamental radiological and clinical pelvic parameters: incidence and thickness. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology. 2005;15(3):197-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-005-0239-5

17 Place HM, Hayes AM, Huebner SB, Hayden AM, Israel H, Brechbuhler JL. Pelvic incidence: a fixed value or can you change it? The Spine Journal. 2017;17(10):1565-1569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.037

18 Zhu Y, Zhang X, Fan Y, Zhou Z, Gu G, Wang C, et al. Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine: radiographic analysis of 111 asymptomatic adolescents, a retrospective observational study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2022;23(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05792-x