ÙÚ¯ÙØ Ø«Ø§Ø¨Øª کرد٠داخÙÛ Ø´Ú©Ø³ØªÚ¯ÛØ Ø§Ø³ØªØ§Ø¨ÙÙÙÙ
Volume 8, Issue 2, Spring 2010, Pages 79-85
https://doi.org/10.22034/ijos.2020.121126
Hamid Reza Seyyed Hosseinzadeh, MD, Ali Akbar Esmaieliejah, MD, Seyyed Morteza Kazemi, MD, Mohammad Reza Bigdeli, MD, Mohammad Ali Jalili, MD, Farivar Baghery, MD, Reza Zandi, MD, Seyyed Reza Aghapoor, MD;, Ali Akbar Esmaieliejah, MD, Alireza Eajazi, MD, Farshad Safdari, MSc
Abstract Background: Unstable pelvic fractures are major orthopaedic injuries with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Open surgical stabilization is the standard treatment for a great number of them. Percutaneous surgical fixation has become an accepted treatment method in last several years. We would like to report our experience with this relatively, newer technique in a small mixed group of unstable pelvic ring fractures.Methods: This is a report of 16 cases (13 males, 3 females) with mean age of 31±8 years of pelvic and acetabular fractures who received percutaneous iliosacral or iliopubic screw fixation, under C-arm imaging control, and had a 6 months period of clinical and radiographic follow-up.Results: All 16 cases had healed their fractures at follow-up and had full weight-bearing status. 12 cases returned to their pre-fracture activities. One screw break and one wound infection were the complications list. There was no neurological deficit, and average blood loss was 10 milliliters.Conclusion: Percutaneous iliosacral or iliopubic screw fixation for, respectively, posterior pelvic ring or anterior column acetabular injuries are useful surgical treatment options with low complication rates.
Comparison of Mobile-Bearing and Fixed-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty (Short-Term Functional Results)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Autumn 2009, Pages 167-171
https://doi.org/10.22034/ijos.2020.121143
Seyyed Morteza Kazemi, MD, Reza Minaei, MD, Mohammad Ali Okhovatpoor, MD, Ramin Farhang Zanganeh, MD, Mohammad Reza Bigdeli, MD, Seyed Reza Aghapour, MD
Abstract Background: The role of a mobile-bearing knee arthroplasty is still not clear. This study was designed to compare the mobile and fixed-bearing prosthesis.Methods: In 30 knees a fixed-bearing and in 38 knees a mobile-bearing prosthesis was used. The results were compared using the "Knee Society Scoring System".Results: The mobile-bearing group of patients had an average age of 65 and 34 months average follow-up. The fixed-bearing group had an average age of 69 years and a mean follow-up of 30 months. The average knee score, functional score and overall score in the mobile-bearing group rose from 29, 45, 73 to 64, 67, 128 and in the fixed-bearing group from 31.7, 34, 65.9 to 68, 57, 125 prospectively. The difference between two groups was not significant statistically.Conclusion: Although in both groups the average knee scores increased after the operation, there were, however, no significant difference between knee scores in the two types in short-term, and no preference between two types of prosthesis.