Author = rahmani, shahryar
Knee

Initial Treatment of Knee Traumatic Dislocation (A Cross-Sectional Study (

Volume 23, Issue 4, Autumn 2025, Pages 180-184

https://doi.org/10.22034/ijos.2025.243325

mojtaba baniasadi, mehdi hadian, mohammad rostami, Alirza Assadi, shahryar rahmani

Abstract Abstract
Introduction: Knee dislocation has potential for complex injury to blood vessels nerves and ligaments. It requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. Radiological assessments aid in guiding appropriate orthopedic and surgical interventions. This study aims to assess the treatment outcomes of knee dislocations.
Materials & Methods: A cross-sectional study of patients admitted to an orthopedic center within 4 years with knee dislocation was conducted. Demographic data, initial treatments, correlated injuries, pain severity, and post-surgery outcomes were collected. The initial management which was with external fixation or bracing were conquered. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v25.
Results & Discussion: Sixty-two patients (11 female, 51 male) were enrolled. Motor vehicle accident, car accident, and falls were common causes. Co-occurring injuries included ligamentous, vascular, and nerve injuries, with the first one being predominant. The initial treatments were by either bracing or external fixation. No re-dislocation was reported in the external fixator group, while 5 occurred in the bracing group. Pain severity scores were lower in the external fixator group at 1 and 3 months post-surgery. Time to return to work and duration of rehabilitation were, non-significantly, shorter in brace treatment group.
Conclusion: Both brace and external fixator show promise as initial knee dislocation treatments, offering distinct benefits. Definitive conclusions warrant comprehensive clinical trials.

Shoulder & Elbow

Effect of reaming on intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures

Volume 21, Issue 4, Winter 2025, Pages 115-121

https://doi.org/10.22034/ijos.2025.449941.1083

MAHDI HADIAN, maryam riahi, mojtaba baniasadi, shahryar Rahmani

Abstract Abstract
Introduction: Humeral shaft fractures are highly prevalent. These fractures can lead to complications and significantly impact quality of life. Choosing the appropriate surgery type presents challenges of high cost, and economic burden. We are investigating and comparing the outcome of Intramedullary Nailing (IMN) surgery with reaming and nailing without reaming as a treatment method for humeral shaft fractures and its outcomes.
Materials & Methods: This study was a prospective cohort study that examined patients with humerus shaft fractures in 2023. The study was conducted on nailing humeral fractures in a teaching hospital. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: One group was treated with intramedullary nailing with reaming, and the other group without reaming. The patients were monitored for pain, delayed union, non-union, infection, radial nerve palsy, and healing status at intervals of two weeks, one, three, and six months after surgery.
Results & Discussion: Sixty-nine patients including 29 in non-reamed and 40 in the reamed cases were studied. Union was observed at 11.1±3.5 weeks in non-reamed and 8.2±1.9 in reamed group, delayed union was observed in 3 of non-reamed and 2 of reamed cases. One case of non-union was in non-reamed group. In the second week of the follow-up, the reamed group reported significantly higher pain levels; however, no significant difference was observed in the 4th and 12th weeks of follow-up. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding complications.
Conclusion: Reamed IMN of humeral fracture can reduce the union time, and helps to lower the occurrence of delayed union and non-union. However, the patients would experience more pain in few first post-surgery weeks and reaming.